SAP S/4HANA, Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O, Salesforce, ServiceNow — across the UK, Germany, the US, Canada, and Australia. We write the requirements, lead the UAT, manage the cut-over, and stay until the system is live.
ERP implementations fail when the system integrator writes requirements and hands them to someone else. The gap between what a vendor delivers and what a business can actually adopt is where most programmes lose their business case. We close that gap by maintaining direct delivery accountability from requirements through to post-go-live stabilisation.
We have rescued programmes that were running three months late and delivered them on time by restructuring workstreams, replacing informal handover processes with formal dependency management, and putting named practitioners with direct accountability at every critical path decision point.
Our ERP practitioners have delivered across the UK, Germany, the US, Canada, and Australia — in financial services, insurance, retail, and government. Every programme is different; the accountability model is not.
SAP S/4HANA · Microsoft Dynamics 365 F&O · Salesforce · ServiceNow · Workday · AWS · Azure · GCP
Most ERP programmes fail not because the technology is wrong but because accountability is split between the vendor, the integrator, and the client. We hold the delivery accountability on the client side — writing requirements, leading UAT, managing the cut-over, and staying through hypercare. Not handing over and walking out.
UK · Germany · United States · Canada · Australia
Financial Services · Insurance · Retail · Government · Enterprise SaaS
ERP programmes fail for predictable reasons. Tell us where yours is now and we will tell you honestly whether we can help — and what it would take to get back on track.
Arrange a DiagnosticTell us about your ERP programme — where it is now, where it needs to be — and we will be direct about whether we can help.
Arrange a Diagnostic